What can a company do to influence and lead public opinion?
In the past the answer was bit more simple than today. In the past a company might engage with key contacts in the media and provide content to journalists, thus shaping the message and shaping the conversation. Well in the current era with countless bloggers holding substantial authority with consumers, shaping these conversations becomes a bit more challenging.
Back in 2005 a disgruntled customer of Dell Inc. began to blog regularly about his negative experience with a lemon computer. The “Dell Hell” that Jeff Jurvis created with his blog soon jumped to the top of Google results for “Dell”. This is clearly a problem for Dell’s PR and brand image, but what can be done in this type of situation? Well if I take my former employer as an example, two things should be considered.
Starbucks is a PR lightning rode. Whether because the company naturally emanate a socially responsible image or simply because it is a top 50 brand, Starbucks has consistently been a target for PR attacks. In response the company has done two things well:
-Engage with critics
-Structure the organization to promote conversation
Engaging with critics is relatively simple. Starbucks PR dept spends a significant amount of time romancing individuals with influence and a propensity to criticize.
Starbucks Melody is one such example. This Seattle-based blogger has substantial influence and a very independent voice. In order to avoid future PR mishaps Starbucks has worked hard to establish an open relationship (or at least as open as possible) with individuals like Melody.
However it is my belief that Starbucks will benefit greatly in the coming years from smart restructuring of the org design. The Seattle-headquarters has been restructured now to foster a customer-centric marketing organization. Social media representatives interact with customers, bloggers, tweeters, and journalists on the web everyday. A high degree of autonomy is granted to these individuals in order to retain a sense of authenticity and transparency. Through this two-way conversation Starbucks becomes a more active and engaged partner in finding solutions to the issues customers raise.
It is my opinion that in an attempt the avoid saying the wrong thing many organizations avoid the difficult conversations all together. This is of course short sighted. When an organization strives to and aligns resources to engage more in two way conversations with all stakeholders, the organization can gain a valuable asset in customer service.